chr19-8308268-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_016579.4(CD320):c.23A>G(p.Gln8Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0656 in 1,582,434 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,897 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016579.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- methylmalonic acidemia due to transcobalamin receptor defectInheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.153  AC: 23211AN: 152044Hom.:  3903  Cov.: 33 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.0825  AC: 16026AN: 194160 AF XY:  0.0843   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.0563  AC: 80467AN: 1430272Hom.:  5973  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.0589  AC XY: 41862AN XY: 710656 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.153  AC: 23274AN: 152162Hom.:  3924  Cov.: 33 AF XY:  0.154  AC XY: 11428AN XY: 74394 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified    Benign:1 
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Methylmalonic acidemia due to transcobalamin receptor defect    Benign:1 
- -
not provided    Benign:1 
- -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at