NM_020366.4:c.525A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_020366.4(RPGRIP1):​c.525A>G​(p.Pro175Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.171 in 1,583,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25,153 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.16 ( 2146 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.17 ( 23007 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1
NM_020366.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.77

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1 (HGNC:13436): (RPGR interacting protein 1) This gene encodes a photoreceptor protein that interacts with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator protein and is a key component of cone and rod photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene lead to autosomal recessive congenital blindness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
RPGRIP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cone-rod dystrophy 13
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Leber congenital amaurosis 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • cone-rod dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Leber congenital amaurosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 14-21302522-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-21302522-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 99826.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.77 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.177 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RPGRIP1NM_020366.4 linkc.525A>G p.Pro175Pro synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 25 ENST00000400017.7 NP_065099.3 Q96KN7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1ENST00000400017.7 linkc.525A>G p.Pro175Pro synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 25 1 NM_020366.4 ENSP00000382895.2 Q96KN7-1
RPGRIP1ENST00000557771.5 linkc.525A>G p.Pro175Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 24 5 ENSP00000451219.1 G3V3F7
RPGRIP1ENST00000556336.5 linkc.525A>G p.Pro175Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 21 5 ENSP00000450445.1 G3V236
RPGRIP1ENST00000554750.1 linkn.124A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 2 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.159
AC:
24213
AN:
152084
Hom.:
2146
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.128
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.231
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.162
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.381
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0862
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.113
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.109
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.266
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.180
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.212
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.157
AC:
35780
AN:
227846
AF XY:
0.158
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.111
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.393
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0941
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.106
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.183
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.200
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.173
AC:
247211
AN:
1431778
Hom.:
23007
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.172
AC XY:
122457
AN XY:
710066
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.128
AC:
4228
AN:
33056
American (AMR)
AF:
0.118
AC:
5024
AN:
42580
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.395
AC:
10011
AN:
25314
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0866
AC:
3386
AN:
39118
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.119
AC:
9644
AN:
80970
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.106
AC:
5528
AN:
51920
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.252
AC:
1433
AN:
5682
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.180
AC:
196758
AN:
1094082
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.190
AC:
11199
AN:
59056
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.473
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8160
16320
24481
32641
40801
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
6948
13896
20844
27792
34740
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.159
AC:
24214
AN:
152202
Hom.:
2146
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.154
AC XY:
11441
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.127
AC:
5289
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.162
AC:
2470
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.381
AC:
1321
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0868
AC:
449
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.113
AC:
547
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.109
AC:
1155
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.265
AC:
78
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.180
AC:
12254
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.208
AC:
441
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1055
2110
3166
4221
5276
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
252
504
756
1008
1260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.183
Hom.:
6469
Bravo
AF:
0.165
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0970
AC:
340
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2Other:1
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Retina International
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 6;C2750720:Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 6 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
2.5
DANN
Benign
0.34
PhyloP100
-1.8
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17792599; hg19: chr14-21770681; COSMIC: COSV52850162; API