rs17792599
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_020366.4(RPGRIP1):āc.525A>Gā(p.Pro175Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.171 in 1,583,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25,153 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.16 ( 2146 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.17 ( 23007 hom. )
Consequence
RPGRIP1
NM_020366.4 synonymous
NM_020366.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.77
Genes affected
RPGRIP1 (HGNC:13436): (RPGR interacting protein 1) This gene encodes a photoreceptor protein that interacts with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator protein and is a key component of cone and rod photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene lead to autosomal recessive congenital blindness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 14-21302522-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-21302522-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 99826.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-21302522-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.77 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.177 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1 | NM_020366.4 | c.525A>G | p.Pro175Pro | synonymous_variant | 5/25 | ENST00000400017.7 | NP_065099.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000400017.7 | c.525A>G | p.Pro175Pro | synonymous_variant | 5/25 | 1 | NM_020366.4 | ENSP00000382895.2 | ||
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000557771.5 | c.525A>G | p.Pro175Pro | synonymous_variant | 4/24 | 5 | ENSP00000451219.1 | |||
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000556336.5 | c.525A>G | p.Pro175Pro | synonymous_variant | 4/21 | 5 | ENSP00000450445.1 | |||
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000554750.1 | n.124A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.159 AC: 24213AN: 152084Hom.: 2146 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
24213
AN:
152084
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.157 AC: 35780AN: 227846Hom.: 3267 AF XY: 0.158 AC XY: 19435AN XY: 122916
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
35780
AN:
227846
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
19435
AN XY:
122916
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.173 AC: 247211AN: 1431778Hom.: 23007 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.172 AC XY: 122457AN XY: 710066
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
247211
AN:
1431778
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
122457
AN XY:
710066
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.159 AC: 24214AN: 152202Hom.: 2146 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.154 AC XY: 11441AN XY: 74416
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
24214
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
11441
AN XY:
74416
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
340
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Retina International | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 6;C2750720:Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at