NM_021625.5:c.1824+4C>T

Variant names:

• chr12-109792648-G-A
• rs147259744
• NM_021625.5:c.1824+4C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):​c.1824+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000454 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 (6 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: TRPV4 NM_021625.5 splice_region, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.0001161
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.960

Genes affected

TRPV4 (HGNC:18083): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) This gene encodes a member of the OSM9-like transient receptor potential channel (OTRPC) subfamily in the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels. The encoded protein is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is thought to be involved in the regulation of systemic osmotic pressure. Mutations in this gene are the cause of spondylometaphyseal and metatropic dysplasia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type IIC. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
• BP6: Variant 12-109792648-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109792648-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 283590.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-109792648-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00223 (340/152252) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00737 (306/41540). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00669. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 149 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 340 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPV4	NM_021625.5	c.1824+4C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 11 of 15	ENST00000261740.7	NP_067638.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPV4	ENST00000261740.7	c.1824+4C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 11 of 15	1	NM_021625.5	ENSP00000261740.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00212 AC: 323 AN: 152134 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00698

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00151

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000735

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000593 AC: 149 AN: 251368 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000339 AC XY: 46 AN XY: 135876

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00628

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000723

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000163

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000114

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000978

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000268 AC: 392 AN: 1461838 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 176 AN XY: 727232

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00738

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000850

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000151

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000477

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000712

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00223 AC: 340 AN: 152252 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00200 AC XY: 149 AN XY: 74452

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00737

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00150

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00189

Alfa AF: 0.00125 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00257

Asia WGS AF: 0.00202 AC: 7 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Benign:2

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

Aug 26, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1

Oct 08, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

-

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia) Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Metatropic dysplasia Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.71
CADD	Benign	0.030
DANN	Benign	0.66

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.00012
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.022
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147259744; hg19: chr12-110230453;