NM_080680.3:c.3699C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):c.3699C>T(p.Arg1233Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00225 in 1,612,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 93 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 6 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 87 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.57

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

COL11A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).

BP6

Variant 6-33169482-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33169482-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 197930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-33169482-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr6-33169482-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.57 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00164 (249/152214) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0334 (161/4814). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0292. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 163 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL11A2	NM_080680.3 link	c.3699C>T	p.Arg1233Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 51 of 66	ENST00000341947.7	NP_542411.2	P13942A0A0C4DFS1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL11A2	ENST00000341947.7 link	c.3699C>T	p.Arg1233Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 51 of 66	5	NM_080680.3	ENSP00000339915.2	A0A0C4DFS1
COL11A2	ENST00000374708.8 link	c.3441C>T	p.Arg1147Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 49 of 64	5		ENSP00000363840.4	Q4VXY6
COL11A2	ENST00000477772.1 link	n.273-3666C>T		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 8	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00162

AC:

246

AN:

152096

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000966

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00424

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0330

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00440

AC:

1085

AN:

246332

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00591

AC XY:

793

AN XY:

134260

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00106

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00201

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00235

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0318

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000466

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00230

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00231

AC:

3373

AN:

1460446

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00329

AC XY:

2389

AN XY:

726558

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00161

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0326

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00467

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00164

AC:

249

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00219

AC XY:

163

AN XY:

74436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000987

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00425

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0334

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.000410

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000722

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0230

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Mar 16, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 05, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Arg1233Arg in Exon 51 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 3.1% (505/16152) o f South Asian chromosomes including 8 homozygotes by the Exome Aggregation Conso rtium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs151098305). -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 27, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Stickler Syndrome, Dominant

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fibrochondrogenesis 2

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

May 21, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.90

CADD

Benign

0.13

DANN

Benign

0.56

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over