Menu
GeneBe

rs151098305

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):c.3699C>T(p.Arg1233=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00225 in 1,612,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 93 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 6 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 87 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.57
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 6-33169482-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33169482-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 197930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-33169482-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr6-33169482-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.57 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00164 (249/152214) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0334 (161/4814). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0292. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 163 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
COL11A2NM_080680.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.3699C>T p.Arg1233= synonymous_variant 51/66 ENST00000341947.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
COL11A2ENST00000341947.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3699C>T p.Arg1233= synonymous_variant 51/665 NM_080680.3 P4
COL11A2ENST00000374708.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3441C>T p.Arg1147= synonymous_variant 49/645 A1
COL11A2ENST00000477772.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.273-3666C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00162
AC:
246
AN:
152096
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000966
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0330
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00440
AC:
1085
AN:
246332
Hom.:
20
AF XY:
0.00591
AC XY:
793
AN XY:
134260
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000466
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00231
AC:
3373
AN:
1460446
Hom.:
87
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00329
AC XY:
2389
AN XY:
726558
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0326
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00467
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00164
AC:
249
AN:
152214
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00219
AC XY:
163
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000987
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00425
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0334
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000947
Alfa
AF:
0.000410
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000722
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0230
AC:
79
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 16, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 05, 2015Arg1233Arg in Exon 51 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 3.1% (505/16152) o f South Asian chromosomes including 8 homozygotes by the Exome Aggregation Conso rtium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs151098305). -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 27, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenMay 21, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
Cadd
Benign
0.13
Dann
Benign
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs151098305; hg19: chr6-33137259; API