NM_138694.4:c.3783C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_138694.4(PKHD1):c.3783C>T(p.Gly1261Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G1261G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

PKHD1
NM_138694.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.86

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PKHD1 (HGNC:9016): (PKHD1 ciliary IPT domain containing fibrocystin/polyductin) The protein encoded by this gene is predicted to have a single transmembrane (TM)-spanning domain and multiple copies of an immunoglobulin-like plexin-transcription-factor domain. Alternative splicing results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Other alternatively spliced transcripts have been described, but the full length sequences have not been determined. Several of these transcripts are predicted to encode truncated products which lack the TM and may be secreted. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, also known as polycystic kidney and hepatic disease-1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

PKHD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet
polycystic kidney disease 4
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp
Caroli disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

PKHD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).

BP6

Variant 6-52026027-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-52026027-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 262400.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.86 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PKHD1	NM_138694.4 link	c.3783C>T	p.Gly1261Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 32 of 67	ENST00000371117.8	NP_619639.3	P08F94-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PKHD1	ENST00000371117.8 link	c.3783C>T	p.Gly1261Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 32 of 67	1	NM_138694.4	ENSP00000360158.3		P08F94-1
PKHD1	ENST00000340994.4 link	c.3783C>T	p.Gly1261Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 32 of 61	5		ENSP00000341097.4		P08F94-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000973

AC:

148

AN:

152114

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000266

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0571

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00123

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000583

AC:

146

AN:

250602

AF XY:

0.000627

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000248

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000579

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000545

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000491

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00104

AC:

1514

AN:

1461802

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00106

AC XY:

770

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000894

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000383

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000225

AC:

AN:

53354

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00131

AC:

1461

AN:

1111994

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000546

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

186

280

373

466

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

104

156

208

260

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000972

AC:

148

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00107

AC XY:

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000265

AC:

AN:

41532

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00108

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00115

EpiCase

AF:

0.000981

EpiControl

AF:

0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 26, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 12, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Nov 16, 2017

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Oct 29, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 18, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.86

CADD

Benign

0.12

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.47

PhyloP100

-2.9

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over