NM_172201.2:c.178T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_172201.2(KCNE2):c.178T>C(p.Phe60Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. F60I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_172201.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial atrial fibrillationInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- long QT syndrome 6Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- long QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNE2 | NM_172201.2 | c.178T>C | p.Phe60Leu | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | ENST00000290310.4 | NP_751951.1 | |
LOC105372791 | NR_188571.1 | n.631A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 3 | ||||
LOC105372791 | NR_188572.1 | n.631A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Long QT syndrome 3/6, digenic Pathogenic:1
- -
Congenital long QT syndrome Other:1
This variant has been reported as associated with Long QT syndrome in the following publications (PMID:16922724). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at