X-71222995-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_001097642.3(GJB1):c.-16-697G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.66 ( 17658 hom., 20673 hem., cov: 22)
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
GJB1
NM_001097642.3 intron
NM_001097642.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.80
Genes affected
GJB1 (HGNC:4283): (gap junction protein beta 1) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junction proteins are membrane-spanning proteins that assemble to form gap junction channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene cause X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, an inherited peripheral neuropathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant X-71222995-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-71222995-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255410.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-71222995-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB1 | NM_001097642.3 | c.-16-697G>A | intron_variant | ||||
GJB1 | XM_011530907.3 | c.-17+229G>A | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB1 | ENST00000374029.2 | c.-16-697G>A | intron_variant | 5 | P1 | ||||
GJB1 | ENST00000447581.2 | c.-17+229G>A | intron_variant | 5 | P1 | ||||
GJB1 | ENST00000645009.2 | c.-16-697G>A | intron_variant | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.661 AC: 72306AN: 109426Hom.: 17647 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.650 AC XY: 20625AN XY: 31714
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
72306
AN:
109426
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
20625
AN XY:
31714
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: InbreedingCoeff AF: 0.661 AC: 72363AN: 109473Hom.: 17658 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.651 AC XY: 20673AN XY: 31771
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: InbreedingCoeff
AF:
AC:
72363
AN:
109473
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
20673
AN XY:
31771
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy X Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 14, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at