chr1-119916499-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_024408.4(NOTCH2):c.6223G>A(p.Val2075Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00192 in 1,612,348 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

NOTCH2
NM_024408.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.983

Variant links:

Genes affected

NOTCH2 (HGNC:7882): (notch receptor 2) This gene encodes a member of the Notch family. Members of this Type 1 transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple, different domain types. Notch family members play a role in a variety of developmental processes by controlling cell fate decisions. The Notch signaling network is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway which regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells. In Drosophilia, notch interaction with its cell-bound ligands (delta, serrate) establishes an intercellular signaling pathway that plays a key role in development. Homologues of the notch-ligands have also been identified in human, but precise interactions between these ligands and the human notch homologues remain to be determined. This protein is cleaved in the trans-Golgi network, and presented on the cell surface as a heterodimer. This protein functions as a receptor for membrane bound ligands, and may play a role in vascular, renal and hepatic development. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

NOTCH2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009479582).

BP6

Variant 1-119916499-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-119916499-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 134985.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-119916499-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00135 (205/152244) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00219 (149/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0019. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 91 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 205 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NOTCH2	NM_024408.4 link	c.6223G>A	p.Val2075Met	missense_variant	Exon 34 of 34	ENST00000256646.7	NP_077719.2	Q04721Q6IQ50Q9UFD5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NOTCH2	ENST00000256646.7 link	c.6223G>A	p.Val2075Met	missense_variant	Exon 34 of 34	1	NM_024408.4	ENSP00000256646.2		Q04721

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00135

AC:

205

AN:

152126

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000435

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00317

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00219

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00383

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00126

AC:

316

AN:

251066

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00130

AC XY:

177

AN XY:

135698

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00122

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00279

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000926

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00198

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00198

AC:

2892

AN:

1460104

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00197

AC XY:

1431

AN XY:

725948

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000389

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00136

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00257

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000781

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000336

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000300

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00230

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00182

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00135

AC:

205

AN:

152244

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00122

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000433

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00317

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00219

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00379

Alfa

AF:

0.00210

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00153

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00216

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00156

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00209

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00116

AC:

141

EpiCase

AF:

0.00316

EpiControl

AF:

0.00249

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Aug 10, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

NOTCH2: BP4, BS1 -

May 09, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:1Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Sep 25, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hajdu-Cheney syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

NOTCH2-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 17, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hajdu-Cheney syndrome;C1857761:Alagille syndrome due to a NOTCH2 point mutation

Benign:1

Oct 26, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.073

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.40

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.36

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.67

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.16

Eigen

Benign

-0.43

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.31

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.38

LIST_S2

Benign

0.81

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0095

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.35

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.49

PROVEAN

Benign

0.19

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.44

Sift4G

Benign

0.29

Polyphen

0.25

Vest4

0.13

MVP

0.50

MPC

0.15

ClinPred

0.0072

GERP RS

3.7

Varity_R

0.027

gMVP

0.17

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over