chr1-11996170-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 17 ACMG points: 17P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_014874.4(MFN2):c.326A>G(p.Lys109Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K109K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014874.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFN2 | NM_014874.4 | c.326A>G | p.Lys109Arg | missense_variant | 5/19 | ENST00000235329.10 | NP_055689.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFN2 | ENST00000235329.10 | c.326A>G | p.Lys109Arg | missense_variant | 5/19 | 1 | NM_014874.4 | ENSP00000235329.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A2 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | Nov 22, 2024 | The heterozygous p.Lys109Arg variant in MFN2 was identified by our study in 1 individual with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Trio exome analysis showed this variant to be de novo. The p.Lys109Arg variant in MFN2 has been reported in 3 individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (PMID: 31315766, 28660751, 33258288), and was absent from large population studies. This variant has been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 476772) and has been interpreted as pathogenic by LabCorp. This variant was found to be de novo in 2 individuals with confirmed paternity and maternity (PMID: 28660751, 31315766). The number of reported affected individuals with this variant is slightly greater than expected compared to non-affected individuals with this variant. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. The number of missense variants reported in MFN2 in the general population is lower than expected, suggesting there is little benign variation in this gene and slightly increasing the possibility that a missense variant in this gene may not be tolerated. In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely pathogenic for autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PP3_moderate, PS2_moderate, PP2, PM2_supporting, PS4_supporting (Richards 2015). - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 27, 2021 | This sequence change replaces lysine, a(n) basic and polar amino acid, with arginine, a(n) basic and polar amino acid, at codon 109 of the MFN2 protein (p.Lys109Arg). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MFN2 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 476772). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (PMID: 28660751, 31315766). In at least one individual the variant was observed to be de novo. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at