chr1-12005784-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_014874.4(MFN2):​c.1569C>T​(p.Ser523Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0552 in 1,614,182 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,840 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.047 ( 234 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.056 ( 2606 hom. )

Consequence

MFN2
NM_014874.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.654
Variant links:
Genes affected
MFN2 (HGNC:16877): (mitofusin 2) This gene encodes a mitochondrial membrane protein that participates in mitochondrial fusion and contributes to the maintenance and operation of the mitochondrial network. This protein is involved in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and it may play a role in the pathophysiology of obesity. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A2, and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy VI, which are both disorders of the peripheral nervous system. Defects in this gene have also been associated with early-onset stroke. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 1-12005784-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-12005784-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 138215.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-12005784-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.654 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.118 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MFN2NM_014874.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1569C>T p.Ser523Ser synonymous_variant 15/19 ENST00000235329.10 NP_055689.1 O95140-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MFN2ENST00000235329.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1569C>T p.Ser523Ser synonymous_variant 15/191 NM_014874.4 ENSP00000235329.5 O95140-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0468
AC:
7128
AN:
152202
Hom.:
233
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0647
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0419
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0815
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.126
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0751
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0567
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0460
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0545
AC:
13696
AN:
251496
Hom.:
500
AF XY:
0.0570
AC XY:
7750
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0228
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0834
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.132
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0782
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0545
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0492
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0561
AC:
82027
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
2606
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0563
AC XY:
40951
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0255
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0795
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.105
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0733
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0566
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0589
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0468
AC:
7133
AN:
152320
Hom.:
234
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0470
AC XY:
3504
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0815
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.126
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0756
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0567
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0450
Alfa
AF:
0.0502
Hom.:
102
Bravo
AF:
0.0469
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0910
AC:
317
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0567
EpiControl
AF:
0.0609

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 24, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with optic atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.83
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1042837; hg19: chr1-12065841; COSMIC: COSV52422680; API