chr1-42830524-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BA1
The NM_001017922.2(ERMAP):c.76C>T(p.His26Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.26 in 1,612,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58,849 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001017922.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERMAP | NM_001017922.2 | c.76C>T | p.His26Tyr | missense_variant | 3/12 | ENST00000372517.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERMAP | ENST00000372517.8 | c.76C>T | p.His26Tyr | missense_variant | 3/12 | 1 | NM_001017922.2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.212 AC: 32257AN: 152024Hom.: 4384 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.244 AC: 61305AN: 251350Hom.: 8652 AF XY: 0.245 AC XY: 33242AN XY: 135842
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.265 AC: 387461AN: 1459940Hom.: 54464 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.264 AC XY: 192065AN XY: 726374
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.212 AC: 32258AN: 152142Hom.: 4385 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.214 AC XY: 15941AN XY: 74362
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
ERMAP-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 21, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at