chr1-45329355-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):c.1517G>A(p.Arg506Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00187 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R506P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 29 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 18 hom. )

Consequence

MUTYH
NM_001048174.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.11

Variant links:

Genes affected

MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]

MUTYH links:

ENSG00000288208 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000288208 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0021564662).

BP6

Variant 1-45329355-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45329355-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 41757.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-45329355-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0102 (1558/152226) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0352 (1460/41510). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0337. There are 29 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 734 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 29 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MUTYH	NM_001048174.2 link	c.1517G>A	p.Arg506Gln	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000456914.7	NP_001041639.1	Q9UIF7-6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MUTYH	ENST00000456914.7 link	c.1517G>A	p.Arg506Gln	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 16	1	NM_001048174.2	ENSP00000407590.2	Q9UIF7-6
ENSG00000288208	ENST00000671898.1 link	n.*260G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 21 of 21			ENSP00000499896.1	A0A5F9ZGZ0
ENSG00000288208	ENST00000671898.1 link	n.*260G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 21 of 21			ENSP00000499896.1	A0A5F9ZGZ0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0101

AC:

1540

AN:

152108

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0348

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00497

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00622

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00266

AC:

669

AN:

251496

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00199

AC XY:

271

AN XY:

135922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0377

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000651

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00100

AC:

1464

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000842

AC XY:

612

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0356

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00174

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000812

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000396

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00200

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0102

AC:

1558

AN:

152226

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00986

AC XY:

734

AN XY:

74422

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0352

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00497

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00616

Alfa

AF:

0.00239

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0112

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0365

AC:

161

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00327

AC:

397

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:21Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 09, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 17, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 30, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 21, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: MUTYH c.1601G>A (p.Arg534Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0027 in 252838 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.038 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 8-fold the estimated maximal pathogenioc allele frequency expected for a variant in MUTYH causing MUTYH-associated Polyposis phenotype (0.0046), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.1601G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with lung cancer (e.g. Fleischmann_2004) and colorectal adenoma (e.g. Olschwang_2007) without storng evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with MUTYH-associated Polyposis. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRCA1 c.5177_5180delGAAA, MLH1 c.677G>A, PALB2 c.172_175delTTGT; all internal LCA samples), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Several publications evaluating the variant's impact on protein function report conflicting results (Brinkmeyer_2015, Komine_2015). Six other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:5

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 30, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:5

Dec 17, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 21, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

May 16, 2023

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 30, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 16, 2018

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial adenomatous polyposis 2

Benign:2

Jan 31, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Carcinoma of colon

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

#N/A -

Gastric cancer;C3272841:Familial adenomatous polyposis 2

Benign:1

Dec 22, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.071

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.47

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

6.0

DANN

Benign

0.89

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.045

.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.4

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.010

LIST_S2

Benign

0.78

.;.;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0022

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.93

.;.;.;.;.;.;L;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.17

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.46

N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.24

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.20

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.026, 0.043, 0.032

.;.;.;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;B;.

Vest4

0.11

MVP

0.48

MPC

0.13

ClinPred

0.0017

GERP RS

-3.6

Varity_R

0.045

gMVP

0.15

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over