chr1-68431319-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BA1BS3_SupportingBS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.1301C>T (p.Ala434Val) missense variant that is present in gnomAD v.2.1.1 at a GrpMax allele frequency of 0.07646, with 1976 alleles / 24962 total alleles in the African / African-American population with 72 homozygotes, which is higher than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP BA1 threshold of >0.008 (BA1). The variant has been reported in at least one patient with retinal dystrophy, however the phenotype is not specific to RPE65 and no second variant was described in trans (PMID:9501220). Three separate publications on families who carry this variant have reported unaffected individuals who harbor it in homozygous state (PMID:19431183, PMID:9501220, PMID:19920137, BS2). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.418, which is below the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP threshold of ≥ 0.7 and does not predict a damaging effect on RPE65 function. Additionally, the splicing impact predictor SpliceAI gives a score of 0.14, which is below the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP recommended threshold of ≥0.2 and does not strongly predict an impact on splicing. The variant exhibited 110% or 55% enzymatic activity in two retinoid isomerase assays relative to the wild-type control, which are higher than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD BS3_Supporting threshold of >50% activity, indicating that it largely preserves normal protein function (PMID:19431183, PMID:16150724, BS3_Supporting). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Benign for RPE65-related recessive retinopathy based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LCA/eoRD VCEP: BA1, BS2, BS3_supporting. (VCEP specifications version 1.0.0; date of approval 09/21/2023). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA226501/MONDO:0100368/120
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000329.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0220 AC: 3353AN: 152152Hom.: 109 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00574 AC: 1441AN: 250840 AF XY: 0.00412 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00210 AC: 3065AN: 1461654Hom.: 113 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00178 AC XY: 1293AN XY: 727110 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0220 AC: 3349AN: 152268Hom.: 109 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0205 AC XY: 1530AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2Other:1
- -
- -
- -
Leber congenital amaurosis 2;C3151086:Retinitis pigmentosa 20 Benign:2
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
- -
RPE65-related recessive retinopathy Benign:1
The NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.1301C>T (p.Ala434Val) missense variant that is present in gnomAD v.2.1.1 at a GrpMax allele frequency of 0.07646, with 1976 alleles / 24962 total alleles in the African / African-American population with 72 homozygotes, which is higher than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP BA1 threshold of >0.008 (BA1). The variant has been reported in at least one patient with retinal dystrophy, however the phenotype is not specific to RPE65 and no second variant was described in trans (PMID: 9501220). Three separate publications on families who carry this variant have reported unaffected individuals who harbor it in homozygous state (PMID: 19431183, PMID: 9501220, PMID: 19920137, BS2). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.418, which is below the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP threshold of greater than or equal to 0.7 and does not predict a damaging effect on RPE65 function. Additionally, the splicing impact predictor SpliceAI gives a score of 0.14, which is below the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP recommended threshold of greater than or equal to 0.2 and does not strongly predict an impact on splicing. The variant exhibited 110% or 55% enzymatic activity in two retinoid isomerase assays relative to the wild-type control, which are higher than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD BS3_Supporting threshold of >50% activity, indicating that it largely preserves normal protein function (PMID: 19431183, PMID: 16150724, BS3_Supporting). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Benign for RPE65-related recessive retinopathy based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LCA/eoRD VCEP: BA1, BS2, BS3_supporting. (VCEP specifications version 1.0.0; date of approval 09/21/2023). -
Leber congenital amaurosis Benign:1
- -
Leber congenital amaurosis 2;C3151086:Retinitis pigmentosa 20;C5231465:Retinitis pigmentosa 87 with choroidal involvement Benign:1
- -
Leber congenital amaurosis 2 Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at