chr1-97699535-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_StrongBA1
The NM_000110.4(DPYD):c.496A>G(p.Met166Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0895 in 1,612,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7,345 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as drug response (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M166T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000110.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYD | NM_000110.4 | c.496A>G | p.Met166Val | missense_variant | 6/23 | ENST00000370192.8 | NP_000101.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYD | ENST00000370192.8 | c.496A>G | p.Met166Val | missense_variant | 6/23 | 1 | NM_000110.4 | ENSP00000359211.3 | ||
DPYD | ENST00000474241.1 | n.260A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0801 AC: 12181AN: 152000Hom.: 626 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0853 AC: 21419AN: 251038Hom.: 1135 AF XY: 0.0899 AC XY: 12198AN XY: 135658
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0905 AC: 132173AN: 1460860Hom.: 6719 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0920 AC XY: 66851AN XY: 726740
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0802 AC: 12194AN: 152118Hom.: 626 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0833 AC XY: 6196AN XY: 74342
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | DPYD: BS1, BS2 - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Diasio Lab, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 29, 2016 | - - |
DPYD-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 14, 2023 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
fluorouracil response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 29, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
capecitabine response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at