chr10-102615273-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_016169.4(SUFU):c.1028G>A(p.Arg343His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000162 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SUFU
NM_016169.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.60

Variant links:

Genes affected

SUFU (HGNC:16466): (SUFU negative regulator of hedgehog signaling) The Hedgehog signaling pathway plays an important role in early human development. The pathway is a signaling cascade that plays a role in pattern formation and cellular proliferation during development. This gene encodes a negative regulator of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Defects in this gene are a cause of medulloblastoma. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

SUFU links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 10-102615273-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-102615273-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135285.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=6, not_provided=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000723 (11/152202) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000118 (8/68006). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000584. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 5 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SUFU	NM_016169.4 link	c.1028G>A	p.Arg343His	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 12	ENST00000369902.8	NP_057253.2	Q9UMX1-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SUFU	ENST00000369902.8 link	c.1028G>A	p.Arg343His	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 12	1	NM_016169.4	ENSP00000358918.4	Q9UMX1-1
SUFU	ENST00000423559.2 link	c.1028G>A	p.Arg343His	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 10	1		ENSP00000411597.2	Q9UMX1-3
SUFU	ENST00000369899.6 link	c.1028G>A	p.Arg343His	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 11	1		ENSP00000358915.2	Q9UMX1-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152086

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000875

AC:

AN:

251430

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000809

AC XY:

AN XY:

135904

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000158

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000171

AC:

250

AN:

1461878

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000162

AC XY:

118

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000214

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000116

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000672

AC XY:

AN XY:

74408

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000901

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000778

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000465

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000107

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:3Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:4

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The SUFU p.R343H variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs79299301), Cosmic and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Illumina and Fulgent Genetics). The variant was identified in control databases in 23 of 282820 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00008132 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 2 of 7224 chromosomes (freq: 0.000277), European (non-Finnish) in 19 of 129150 chromosomes (freq: 0.000147), African in 1 of 24960 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004) and South Asian in 1 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000033), but was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or European (Finnish) populations. The p.R343 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Sep 11, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The SUFU c.1028G>A; p.Arg343His variant (rs79299301) is reported in the literature in an individual affected with chordoma, but without clear disease association (Yepes 2021). This variant is also reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 135285), and is found in the non-Finnish European population with an allele frequency of 0.015% (19/129150 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.473). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. -

Aug 05, 2024

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The SUFU c.1028G>A (p.Arg343His) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with chordoma (PMID: 34070849 (2021)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00015 (19/129150 chromosomes in European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Dec 04, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Observed in an individual with a personal history of chondroma (PMID: 34070849); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 26336887, 34070849, 24311597) -

Familial meningioma

Uncertain:1

Sep 05, 2023

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma;C3551915:Familial meningioma;C4540342:Joubert syndrome 32

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Medulloblastoma

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

SUFU-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 30, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 04, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.38

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.019

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.060

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.24

T;.;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.81

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.81

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.053

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.66

D;D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.070

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.7

L;L;L

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.65

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.88

N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.47

Sift

Benign

0.041

D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.017

D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;D

Vest4

0.70

MVP

0.71

MPC

1.8

ClinPred

0.37

GERP RS

5.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.16

gMVP

0.45

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over