rs79299301
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP6BS1BS2
The NM_016169.4(SUFU):c.1028G>A(p.Arg343His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000162 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SUFU
NM_016169.4 missense
NM_016169.4 missense
Scores
3
10
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.60
Genes affected
SUFU (HGNC:16466): (SUFU negative regulator of hedgehog signaling) The Hedgehog signaling pathway plays an important role in early human development. The pathway is a signaling cascade that plays a role in pattern formation and cellular proliferation during development. This gene encodes a negative regulator of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Defects in this gene are a cause of medulloblastoma. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), SUFU. . Gene score misZ 1.9341 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.1202 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with apraxia, ciliopathy, ocular motor apraxia, Cogan type, nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, Joubert syndrome, Joubert syndrome 32, medulloblastoma.
BP6
Variant 10-102615273-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-102615273-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135285.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, not_provided=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=5}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000723 (11/152202) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000118 (8/68006). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000584. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 5 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUFU | NM_016169.4 | c.1028G>A | p.Arg343His | missense_variant | 9/12 | ENST00000369902.8 | NP_057253.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUFU | ENST00000369902.8 | c.1028G>A | p.Arg343His | missense_variant | 9/12 | 1 | NM_016169.4 | ENSP00000358918 | P1 | |
SUFU | ENST00000423559.2 | c.1028G>A | p.Arg343His | missense_variant | 9/10 | 1 | ENSP00000411597 | |||
SUFU | ENST00000369899.6 | c.1028G>A | p.Arg343His | missense_variant | 9/11 | 1 | ENSP00000358915 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152086Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152086
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000875 AC: 22AN: 251430Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000809 AC XY: 11AN XY: 135904
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
251430
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
135904
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000171 AC: 250AN: 1461878Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 118AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
250
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
118
AN XY:
727240
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74408
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74408
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
AC:
13
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:3Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 28, 2024 | Observed in an individual with a personal history of chondroma (PMID: 34070849); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 26336887, 34070849) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 11, 2023 | The SUFU c.1028G>A; p.Arg343His variant (rs79299301) is reported in the literature in an individual affected with chordoma, but without clear disease association (Yepes 2021). This variant is also reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 135285), and is found in the non-Finnish European population with an allele frequency of 0.015% (19/129150 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.473). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The SUFU p.R343H variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs79299301), Cosmic and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Illumina and Fulgent Genetics). The variant was identified in control databases in 23 of 282820 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00008132 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 2 of 7224 chromosomes (freq: 0.000277), European (non-Finnish) in 19 of 129150 chromosomes (freq: 0.000147), African in 1 of 24960 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004) and South Asian in 1 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000033), but was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or European (Finnish) populations. The p.R343 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Familial meningioma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 05, 2023 | - - |
Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma;C3551915:Familial meningioma;C4540342:Joubert syndrome 32 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Medulloblastoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
SUFU-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 30, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 04, 2021 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D
Polyphen
D;D;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at