chr10-110810464-T-TGAG

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.1880+4_1880+6dupAGG variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0027 in 1,550,344 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0029 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.92

Variant links:

Genes affected

RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

RBM20 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 10-110810464-T-TGAG is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110810464-T-TGAG is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43978.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=3, Likely_benign=4}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00128 (194/152144) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00235 (160/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00205. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 82 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 194 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RBM20	NM_001134363.3 link	c.1880+4_1880+6dupAGG	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 13	ENST00000369519.4	NP_001127835.2	Q5T481
RBM20	XM_017016103.3 link	c.1715+4_1715+6dupAGG	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 13		XP_016871592.1
RBM20	XM_017016104.3 link	c.1496+4_1496+6dupAGG	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 13		XP_016871593.1
RBM20	XM_047425116.1 link	c.1496+4_1496+6dupAGG	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 13		XP_047281072.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RBM20	ENST00000369519.4 link	c.1880+2_1880+3insGAG		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 13	1	NM_001134363.3	ENSP00000358532.3		Q5T481

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00128

AC:

194

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000628

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000472

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00235

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00106

AC:

166

AN:

156316

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00111

AC XY:

AN XY:

82832

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000505

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000122

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000238

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00248

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00286

AC:

3994

AN:

1398200

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00280

AC XY:

1930

AN XY:

689672

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000285

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000126

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00349

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00343

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00128

AC:

194

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00110

AC XY:

AN XY:

74304

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000628

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000472

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00235

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000478

Alfa

AF:

0.00182

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00140

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Jan 10, 2020

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.1880+4_1880+6dupAGG variant in RBM20 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 0.2% (177/75818) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: RBM20 c.1880+4_1880+6dupAGG alters a nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 156316 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency is approximately 22 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RBM20 causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (4.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1880+4_1880+6dupAGG has been reported in the literature in sequencing studies reporting individuals affected with sporadic or familial Dialated Cardiomyopathy (example, Haas_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS, n=1; likely benign, n=3, benign, n=1). One submitter reports this variant as having co-occurred with another pathogenic variant that clearly explained the patient phenotype. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Jan 13, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25163546) -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

RBM20: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 30, 2021

Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

RBM20 NM_001134363.2 exon 8 c.1880+4_1880+6dup: This variant has been reported in the literature in at least one individual with DCM (Haas 2015 PMID:25163546). However, this variant is also present in 0.2% (177/75818) of European alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, including 2 homozygotes (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/10-112570222-T-TGAG) and is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as likely benign (Variation ID:43978). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. Although this variant occurs in the splice region, computational prediction tools do not suggest that it alters splicing. However, further studies are needed to understand its impact. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Mar 22, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jul 21, 2014

Blueprint Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

May 30, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over