chr10-1184968-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_018702.4(ADARB2):c.1936G>A(p.Ala646Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000155 in 1,613,738 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A646V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018702.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018702.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADARB2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1936G>A | p.Ala646Thr | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | ENSP00000370713.1 | Q9NS39-1 | ||
| ADARB2 | TSL:1 | c.463G>A | p.Ala155Thr | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000370711.3 | Q9NS39-2 | ||
| ADARB2 | TSL:1 | n.136G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000160 AC: 4AN: 250294 AF XY: 0.00000738 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000151 AC: 22AN: 1461472Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727070 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74390 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at