chr10-47350279-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_002900.3(RBP3):āc.1795A>Gā(p.Ile599Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 1,608,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 7/10 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002900.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBP3 | NM_002900.3 | c.1795A>G | p.Ile599Val | missense_variant | 1/4 | ENST00000584701.2 | NP_002891.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBP3 | ENST00000584701.2 | c.1795A>G | p.Ile599Val | missense_variant | 1/4 | 1 | NM_002900.3 | ENSP00000463151 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00122 AC: 186AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00114 AC: 278AN: 244020Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00115 AC XY: 153AN XY: 133232
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00131 AC: 1902AN: 1456248Hom.: 5 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 930AN XY: 724744
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00122 AC: 186AN: 152272Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00117 AC XY: 87AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 04, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2022 | RBP3: PP4 - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jul 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 66 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | ClinVar Staff, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) | Jun 27, 2013 | - - |
RBP3-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 10, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at