rs144289912

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_002900.3(RBP3):​c.1795A>G​(p.Ile599Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 1,608,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 7/10 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

RBP3
NM_002900.3 missense

Scores

1
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.12

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBP3 (HGNC:9921): (retinol binding protein 3) Interphotoreceptor retinol-binding protein is a large glycoprotein known to bind retinoids and found primarily in the interphotoreceptor matrix of the retina between the retinal pigment epithelium and the photoreceptor cells. It is thought to transport retinoids between the retinal pigment epithelium and the photoreceptors, a critical role in the visual process.The human IRBP gene is approximately 9.5 kbp in length and consists of four exons separated by three introns. The introns are 1.6-1.9 kbp long. The gene is transcribed by photoreceptor and retinoblastoma cells into an approximately 4.3-kilobase mRNA that is translated and processed into a glycosylated protein of 135,000 Da. The amino acid sequence of human IRBP can be divided into four contiguous homology domains with 33-38% identity, suggesting a series of gene duplication events. In the gene, the boundaries of these domains are not defined by exon-intron junctions, as might have been expected. The first three homology domains and part of the fourth are all encoded by the first large exon, which is 3,180 base pairs long. The remainder of the fourth domain is encoded in the last three exons, which are 191, 143, and approximately 740 base pairs long, respectively. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RBP3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • retinitis pigmentosa 66
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08782107).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00122 (186/152272) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00333 (51/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0026. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 87 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RBP3NM_002900.3 linkc.1795A>G p.Ile599Val missense_variant Exon 1 of 4 ENST00000584701.2 NP_002891.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RBP3ENST00000584701.2 linkc.1795A>G p.Ile599Val missense_variant Exon 1 of 4 1 NM_002900.3 ENSP00000463151.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00122
AC:
186
AN:
152154
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00114
AC:
278
AN:
244020
AF XY:
0.00115
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000641
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000784
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000100
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000877
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00149
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00131
AC:
1902
AN:
1456248
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
930
AN XY:
724744
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
3
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000895
AC:
40
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000959
AC:
46
AN:
47990
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00191
AC:
11
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00155
AC:
1728
AN:
1111892
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
72
AN:
60340
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
147
294
442
589
736
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
60
120
180
240
300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00122
AC:
186
AN:
152272
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00117
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
8
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00333
AC:
51
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00113
AC:
12
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00160
AC:
109
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
29
39
49
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00174
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00118

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 04, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

RBP3: PP4 -

Jan 07, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa;C3715216:Retinitis pigmentosa 66 Uncertain:1
Jul 30, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Jan 01, 2023
Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa 66 Uncertain:1
Jun 27, 2013
ClinVar Staff, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Jul 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

RBP3-related disorder Benign:1
Nov 10, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.063
T
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.088
T
PhyloP100
2.1
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D
Vest4
0.15
gMVP
0.87

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144289912; hg19: chr10-48389083; API