chr10-71802987-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):​c.7572G>A​(p.Ala2524Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.288 in 1,613,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70,525 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.28 ( 6163 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.29 ( 64362 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.97

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
CDH23 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 1D
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 10-71802987-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71802987-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46034.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.97 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.514 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkc.7572G>A p.Ala2524Ala synonymous_variant Exon 54 of 70 ENST00000224721.12 NP_071407.4 Q9H251-1Q6P152
CDH23NM_001171933.1 linkc.852G>A p.Ala284Ala synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 23 NP_001165404.1 Q9H251-7
CDH23NM_001171934.1 linkc.852G>A p.Ala284Ala synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 22 NP_001165405.1 Q9H251-9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkc.7572G>A p.Ala2524Ala synonymous_variant Exon 54 of 70 5 NM_022124.6 ENSP00000224721.9 Q9H251-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.276
AC:
41987
AN:
151946
Hom.:
6157
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.228
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.382
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.330
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.222
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.531
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.263
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.345
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.120
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.267
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.261
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.311
AC:
77390
AN:
249164
AF XY:
0.300
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.227
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.430
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.221
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.527
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.347
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.285
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.290
AC:
423505
AN:
1461662
Hom.:
64362
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.286
AC XY:
208009
AN XY:
727116
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.226
AC:
7574
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.418
AC:
18710
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.224
AC:
5844
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.575
AC:
22815
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.247
AC:
21318
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.345
AC:
18416
AN:
53390
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.171
AC:
984
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.279
AC:
310427
AN:
1111844
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.288
AC:
17417
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18130
36261
54391
72522
90652
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10716
21432
32148
42864
53580
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.276
AC:
42013
AN:
152066
Hom.:
6163
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.280
AC XY:
20835
AN XY:
74330
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.228
AC:
9466
AN:
41474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.330
AC:
5049
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.222
AC:
771
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.531
AC:
2740
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.263
AC:
1267
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.345
AC:
3651
AN:
10570
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.129
AC:
38
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.267
AC:
18138
AN:
67968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.259
AC:
545
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1585
3171
4756
6342
7927
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
436
872
1308
1744
2180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.262
Hom.:
2792
Bravo
AF:
0.278
Asia WGS
AF:
0.358
AC:
1245
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.256
EpiControl
AF:
0.258

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jun 12, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 08, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
0.055
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
-3.0
Mutation Taster
=92/8
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10823849; hg19: chr10-73562744; COSMIC: COSV56453841; API