rs10823849

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):​c.7572G>A​(p.Ala2524=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.288 in 1,613,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70,525 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.28 ( 6163 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.29 ( 64362 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.97
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 10-71802987-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71802987-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 46034.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-71802987-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.97 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.514 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.7572G>A p.Ala2524= synonymous_variant 54/70 ENST00000224721.12
CDH23NM_001171933.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.852G>A p.Ala284= synonymous_variant 7/23
CDH23NM_001171934.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.852G>A p.Ala284= synonymous_variant 7/22

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.7572G>A p.Ala2524= synonymous_variant 54/705 NM_022124.6 P1Q9H251-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.276
AC:
41987
AN:
151946
Hom.:
6157
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.228
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.382
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.330
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.222
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.531
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.263
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.345
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.120
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.267
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.261
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.311
AC:
77390
AN:
249164
Hom.:
13107
AF XY:
0.300
AC XY:
40505
AN XY:
135194
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.227
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.430
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.221
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.527
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.250
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.347
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.285
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.290
AC:
423505
AN:
1461662
Hom.:
64362
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.286
AC XY:
208009
AN XY:
727116
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.226
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.418
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.224
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.575
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.247
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.345
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.279
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.288
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.276
AC:
42013
AN:
152066
Hom.:
6163
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.280
AC XY:
20835
AN XY:
74330
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.228
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.330
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.222
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.531
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.263
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.345
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.267
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.259
Alfa
AF:
0.262
Hom.:
2774
Bravo
AF:
0.278
Asia WGS
AF:
0.358
AC:
1245
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.256
EpiControl
AF:
0.258

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 08, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 12, 2009- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
0.055
DANN
Benign
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10823849; hg19: chr10-73562744; COSMIC: COSV56453841; API