chr10-86923716-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.1596C>G(p.Ile532Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000657 in 1,613,488 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I532T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000072 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.207

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

BMPR1A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
juvenile polyposis syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
congenital heart defects, multiple types
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
pulmonary arterial hypertension
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

BMPR1A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 105 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BMPR1A	NM_004329.3 link	c.1596C>G	p.Ile532Met	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 13	ENST00000372037.8	NP_004320.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BMPR1A	ENST00000372037.8 link	c.1596C>G	p.Ile532Met	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 13	1	NM_004329.3	ENSP00000361107.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000279

AC:

AN:

250934

AF XY:

0.0000294

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000628

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000719

AC:

105

AN:

1461162

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000688

AC XY:

AN XY:

726882

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33466

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86218

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5180

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000890

AC:

AN:

1112000

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000663

AC:

AN:

60320

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.474

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000656

AC:

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41574

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000487

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:4

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:research

- -

Jun 09, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22703879) -

Dec 11, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 30, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000044 (5/113596 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported as a variant of uncertain significance in cancer association study using whole exome sequencing (PMID: 22703879 (2012)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Apr 10, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces isoleucine with methionine at codon 532 of the BMPR1A protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with BMPR1A-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 7/250934 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Dec 09, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 23, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Juvenile polyposis syndrome

Uncertain:2

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 532 of the BMPR1A protein (p.Ile532Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs201345248, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BMPR1A-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 41781). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BMPR1A protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Apr 25, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2

Uncertain:1

Dec 04, 2023

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli

Uncertain:1

Sep 09, 2024

Molecular Pathology, Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.15

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.11

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.22

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.91

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.30

Eigen

Benign

0.012

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.0077

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.10

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.44

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.31

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.59

PhyloP100

0.21

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.77

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.80

REVEL

Uncertain

0.51

Sift

Benign

0.31

Sift4G

Benign

0.25

Polyphen

0.91

Vest4

0.54

MVP

0.64

MPC

1.4

ClinPred

0.090

GERP RS

2.1

Varity_R

0.068

gMVP

0.71

Mutation Taster

=61/39

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over