chr11-108272824-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.3256C>T​(p.Arg1086Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000867 in 1,613,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.366
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1284627).
BP6
Variant 11-108272824-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108272824-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 234020.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=7}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkc.3256C>T p.Arg1086Cys missense_variant Exon 22 of 63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3 Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkc.3256C>T p.Arg1086Cys missense_variant Exon 22 of 63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606.1 Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152086
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000279
AC:
7
AN:
251210
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000295
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135760
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000753
AC:
11
AN:
1461770
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000963
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727190
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000719
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152204
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000282
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jul 17, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 22, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:2
Apr 26, 2022
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with breast cancer (Girard 2019); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27159395, 30303537) -

Mar 20, 2018
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The ATM c.3256C>T; p.Arg1086Cys variant (rs201780199, ClinVar variant ID 234020), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature, gene specific variation databases, nor has it been previously identified by our laboratory. This variant is listed in the genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) with an overall population frequency of 0.003% (identified on 8 out of 276,914 chromosomes). The arginine at position 1086 is moderately conserved, considering 9 species, and computational analyses of the effects of the p.Arg1086Cys variant on protein structure and function do not predict a deleterious effect (SIFT: tolerated, PolyPhen-2: benign). Based on the available information, the clinical significance of the p.Arg1086Cys variant cannot be determined with certainty. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Apr 06, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.R1086C variant (also known as c.3256C>T), located in coding exon 21 of the ATM gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 3256. The arginine at codon 1086 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration was identified in 1/1207 cases of French women diagnosed with breast cancer who had a sister with breast cancer and were BRCA1 and BRCA2 negative and 0/1199 general population controls (Girard E et al. Int J Cancer, 2019 04;144:1962-1974). This alteration was also reported in 1/5560 prostate cancer cases and in 0/3353 controls of European ancestry (Karlsson Q et al. Eur Urol Oncol, 2021 Aug;4:570-579). This alteration was detected in a cohort of 1663 Brazilian breast cancer patients who underwent hereditary multigene panel testing (Guindalini RSC et al. Sci Rep, 2022 Mar;12:4190). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species, and cysteine is the reference amino acid in other vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Dec 14, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces arginine with cysteine at codon 1086 of the ATM protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. In a large international case-control study, this variant was reported in 1/60466 breast cancer cases and 3/53461 controls (OR=0.295, 95%CI 0.031 to 2.833, p-value=0.347; PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 9/282596 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified Uncertain:1
Aug 03, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: ATM c.3256C>T (p.Arg1086Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 251210 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.3256C>T has been reported in the literature as a monoallelic genotype or with unspcified zygosity in individuals affected with breast cancer or with family history of breast cancer (e.g. Girard_2019, Guindalini_2022), in verified BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer (e.g. Gomes_2020, Zanti_2020), prostate cancer (e.g. Karlsson_2021), or as a compound heterozygous genotype with the second variant reported as VUS in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (e.g. Yin_2022). Most cases occurred in settings of multi-gene panel testing, were often reported as a VUS, with all cases without evidence of causality. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33128190, 33436325, 30303537, 35171259, 35264596, 28652578, 33120919). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, classifying the variant as uncertain significance (n=7), or likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Sep 15, 2023
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Jan 23, 2024
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.089
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.33
.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.44
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.31
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.75
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D;D;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.039
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.13
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.97
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
.;L;L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.6
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.32
Sift
Benign
0.22
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.042
.;B;B
Vest4
0.26, 0.27
MVP
0.75
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.15
T
GERP RS
1.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201780199; hg19: chr11-108143551; COSMIC: COSV53773409; COSMIC: COSV53773409; API