chr11-111910446-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_001289808.2(CRYAB):c.205C>T(p.Arg69Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000403 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R69S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001289808.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- myofibrillar myopathy 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- cataract 16 multiple typesInheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- fatal infantile hypertonic myofibrillar myopathyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet
- early-onset lamellar cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- early-onset nuclear cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- early-onset posterior polar cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- dilated cardiomyopathy 1IIInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000954 AC: 24AN: 251462 AF XY: 0.0000662 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000356 AC: 52AN: 1461860Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000303 AC XY: 22AN XY: 727232 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152294Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1II Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 69 of the CRYAB protein (p.Arg69Cys). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with congenital cataracts (PMID: 21866213). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 570808). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects CRYAB function (PMID: 31678106). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.R69C variant (also known as c.205C>T), located in coding exon 2 of the CRYAB gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 205. The arginine at codon 69 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This variant was reported in individual(s) with features consistent with congenital cataracts (Sun W et al. Mol Vis, 2011 Aug;17:2197-206). In an assay testing CRYAB function, this variant showed a functionally abnormal result (Ghahramani M et al. Int J Biol Macromol, 2020 Mar;146:1142-1160). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at