chr11-17428382-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BA1
The NM_000352.6(ABCC8):c.1947G>A(p.Lys649=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.16 in 1,613,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22,375 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2216 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.16 ( 20159 hom. )
Consequence
ABCC8
NM_000352.6 synonymous
NM_000352.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.86
Genes affected
ABCC8 (HGNC:59): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein functions as a modulator of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and insulin release. Mutations in the ABCC8 gene and deficiencies in the encoded protein have been observed in patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy, an autosomal recessive disorder of unregulated and high insulin secretion. Mutations have also been associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II, an autosomal dominant disease of defective insulin secretion. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 11-17428382-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17428382-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 157686.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=12, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.86 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.276 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC8 | NM_000352.6 | c.1947G>A | p.Lys649= | synonymous_variant | 14/39 | ENST00000389817.8 | NP_000343.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC8 | ENST00000389817.8 | c.1947G>A | p.Lys649= | synonymous_variant | 14/39 | 1 | NM_000352.6 | ENSP00000374467 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.166 AC: 25218AN: 152044Hom.: 2214 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
25218
AN:
152044
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.174 AC: 43615AN: 250856Hom.: 4271 AF XY: 0.178 AC XY: 24148AN XY: 135654
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
43615
AN:
250856
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
24148
AN XY:
135654
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.160 AC: 233646AN: 1461580Hom.: 20159 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.163 AC XY: 118674AN XY: 727072
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
233646
AN:
1461580
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
118674
AN XY:
727072
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.166 AC: 25250AN: 152162Hom.: 2216 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.171 AC XY: 12737AN XY: 74382
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
25250
AN:
152162
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
12737
AN XY:
74382
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1013
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 14, 2014 | - - |
Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 12, 2017 | - - |
Diabetes mellitus, transient neonatal, 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 17, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 14551916) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | Mutations in ABCC8 gene are generally associated with both neonatal diabetes mellitus as well as MODY. Patients with this mutation may respond to sulfonylureas. However, though the prevalence of rs1799858 in congenital hyperinsulinism of Infancy is seen, there is no sufficient evidence to show association of this variant with neonatal diabetes or MODY. - |
Hereditary hyperinsulinism Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Leucine-induced hypoglycemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Diabetes mellitus, permanent neonatal 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at