chr11-18311430-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_181507.2(HPS5):​c.241G>A​(p.Ala81Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00224 in 1,608,378 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

HPS5
NM_181507.2 missense

Scores

7
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.27
Variant links:
Genes affected
HPS5 (HGNC:17022): (HPS5 biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 2 subunit 2) This gene encodes a protein that may play a role in organelle biogenesis associated with melanosomes, platelet dense granules, and lysosomes. This protein interacts with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 6 protein and may interact with the cytoplasmic domain of integrin, alpha-3. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 5. Multiple transcript variants encoding two distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.016596079).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00156 (237/152028) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00375 (18/4804). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00242. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 101 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
HPS5NM_181507.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.241G>A p.Ala81Thr missense_variant 4/23 ENST00000349215.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
HPS5ENST00000349215.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.241G>A p.Ala81Thr missense_variant 4/231 NM_181507.2 P1Q9UPZ3-1
HPS5ENST00000396253.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.-102G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/221 Q9UPZ3-2
HPS5ENST00000438420.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.-102G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/221 Q9UPZ3-2
HPS5ENST00000531848.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-102G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/115

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00155
AC:
236
AN:
151916
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000411
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00220
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00184
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00431
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00165
AC:
412
AN:
249934
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00185
AC XY:
250
AN XY:
135228
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000549
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00307
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00231
AC:
3366
AN:
1456350
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.00247
AC XY:
1789
AN XY:
724918
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000449
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000253
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00323
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00255
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00258
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00156
AC:
237
AN:
152028
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00136
AC XY:
101
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00375
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00427
Alfa
AF:
0.00217
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00173
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00297
AC:
11
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00285
AC:
11
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000682
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00186
AC:
16
ExAC
AF:
0.00152
AC:
185
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 5 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityOct 09, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The HPS5 p.Ala81Thr variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs147053126) and ClinVar (classified as a VUS by Illumina Clinical Services and University of Chicago Genetics Services Laboratory for Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome). The variant was identified in control databases in 444 of 281254 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001579 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 93 of 30314 chromosomes (freq: 0.003068), European (non-Finnish) in 265 of 128834 chromosomes (freq: 0.002057), Latino in 56 of 34854 chromosomes (freq: 0.001607), Other in 11 of 7166 chromosomes (freq: 0.001535), African in 13 of 24908 chromosomes (freq: 0.000522), European (Finnish) in 5 of 25058 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002) and East Asian in 1 of 19768 chromosomes (freq: 0.000051); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The p.Ala81 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 03, 2016- -
HPS5-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 21, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.26
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.15
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.16
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.28
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.33
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.040
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.017
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.81
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.99
N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.23
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.016
D
Polyphen
0.98
D
Vest4
0.48
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
5.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.10
gMVP
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147053126; hg19: chr11-18332977; API