chr11-32428058-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.785G>A(p.Gly262Asp) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000582 in 1,598,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G262R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000058 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense, splice_region

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.51

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Denys-Drash syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
Wilms tumor 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Frasier syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 11-32428058-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32428058-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 406688.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 9 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 link	c.785G>A	p.Gly262Asp	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 3 of 10	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4	P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10 link	c.785G>A	p.Gly262Asp	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 3 of 10	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5		P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000127

AC:

AN:

236414

AF XY:

0.000148

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000301

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00162

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000286

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000351

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000581

AC:

AN:

1446542

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000530

AC XY:

AN XY:

717070

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33150

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000298

AC:

AN:

43692

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00137

AC:

AN:

25564

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39336

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85148

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52638

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000182

AC:

AN:

5482

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000181

AC:

AN:

1102002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000252

AC:

AN:

59530

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74364

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41466

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10632

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68044

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.536

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000165

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000110

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000577

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Dec 11, 2024

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28787462, 8486616) -

Wilms tumor 1

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Aug 21, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Meacham syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

WT1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 19, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 30, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.21

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.0032

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.060

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.78

.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D

Eigen

Uncertain

0.59

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.58

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.92

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

D;.;D;.;.;.;.;.;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.075

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.48

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.42

PhyloP100

3.5

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.77

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.9

D;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.61

Sift

Uncertain

0.0020

D;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.023

D;D;T;D;D;.;.;.;D

Polyphen

0.99

D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.62

MVP

0.93

ClinPred

0.39

GERP RS

5.1

gMVP

0.46

Mutation Taster

=75/25

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over