Menu
GeneBe

rs372225738

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP6BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.785G>A(p.Gly262Asp) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000582 in 1,598,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G262C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000058 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense, splice_region

Scores

13
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 11-32428058-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32428058-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 406688.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=3, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.785G>A p.Gly262Asp missense_variant, splice_region_variant 3/10 ENST00000452863.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.785G>A p.Gly262Asp missense_variant, splice_region_variant 3/101 NM_024426.6 P19544-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000127
AC:
30
AN:
236414
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
128742
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000301
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000286
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000351
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000581
AC:
84
AN:
1446542
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000530
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
717070
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000298
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000181
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000252
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74364
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.000165
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000110
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000577
AC:
7

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 03, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28787462) -
Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
WT1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 19, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 30, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.0032
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.060
Cadd
Pathogenic
27
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.59
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D;.;D;.;.;.;.;.;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.075
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.48
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.42
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.77
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.61
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.023
D;D;T;D;D;.;.;.;D
Polyphen
0.99
D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.62
MVP
0.93
ClinPred
0.39
T
GERP RS
5.1
gMVP
0.46

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs372225738; hg19: chr11-32449604; COSMIC: COSV105901525; API