chr11-66070587-C-CGCAGCAGCA
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP3BP6BS2
The NM_018026.4(PACS1):c.113_121dupAGCAGCAGC(p.Gln38_Gln40dup) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000669 in 1,493,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018026.4 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Schuurs-Hoeijmakers syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018026.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACS1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.113_121dupAGCAGCAGC | p.Gln38_Gln40dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 24 | ENSP00000316454.4 | Q6VY07-1 | ||
| PACS1 | TSL:2 | n.237_245dupAGCAGCAGC | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 7 | |||||
| ENSG00000255038 | n.29+434_29+442dupTGCTGCTGC | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151402Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000435 AC: 4AN: 91850 AF XY: 0.0000382 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000521 AC: 7AN: 1342472Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000302 AC XY: 2AN XY: 663130 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151402Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 73908 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at