chr11-77211163-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.6063G>A​(p.Lys2021Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0056 in 1,580,260 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 408 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.028 ( 219 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 189 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.662

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO7A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia
  • Usher syndrome type 1B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 11-77211163-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77211163-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 43317.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.662 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0956 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000260.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYO7A
NM_000260.4
MANE Select
c.6063G>Ap.Lys2021Lys
synonymous
Exon 45 of 49NP_000251.3
MYO7A
NM_001127180.2
c.5949G>Ap.Lys1983Lys
synonymous
Exon 45 of 49NP_001120652.1
MYO7A
NM_001369365.1
c.5916G>Ap.Lys1972Lys
synonymous
Exon 46 of 50NP_001356294.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYO7A
ENST00000409709.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.6063G>Ap.Lys2021Lys
synonymous
Exon 45 of 49ENSP00000386331.3
MYO7A
ENST00000458637.6
TSL:1
c.5949G>Ap.Lys1983Lys
synonymous
Exon 45 of 49ENSP00000392185.2
MYO7A
ENST00000409619.6
TSL:1
c.5916G>Ap.Lys1972Lys
synonymous
Exon 46 of 50ENSP00000386635.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0283
AC:
4299
AN:
152140
Hom.:
218
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0983
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00838
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0182
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00673
AC:
1339
AN:
198954
AF XY:
0.00526
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0959
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00397
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00889
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000413
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00428
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00318
AC:
4539
AN:
1428002
Hom.:
189
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00276
AC XY:
1953
AN XY:
706634
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.105
AC:
3437
AN:
32766
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00480
AC:
193
AN:
40188
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00906
AC:
230
AN:
25400
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
1
AN:
37976
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000468
AC:
38
AN:
81174
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51048
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00577
AC:
33
AN:
5716
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
191
AN:
1094638
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00704
AC:
416
AN:
59096
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
216
432
649
865
1081
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
110
220
330
440
550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0283
AC:
4303
AN:
152258
Hom.:
219
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0262
AC XY:
1953
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0981
AC:
4074
AN:
41526
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00830
AC:
127
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
36
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000382
AC:
26
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
38
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
199
398
598
797
996
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0151
Hom.:
92
Bravo
AF:
0.0320
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00635
AC:
23
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 12, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 16, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

not specified Benign:2
Dec 14, 2010
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Lys2021Lys in exon 45 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue is not located near a splice junction and is found commonly in the Black population (5/28 = 18%).

Apr 04, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
6.0
DANN
Benign
0.54
PhyloP100
0.66
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033209; hg19: chr11-76922208; API