rs111033209

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.6063G>A​(p.Lys2021=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0056 in 1,580,260 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 408 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.028 ( 219 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 189 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.662
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 11-77211163-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77211163-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 43317.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.662 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0956 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6063G>A p.Lys2021= synonymous_variant 45/49 ENST00000409709.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.6063G>A p.Lys2021= synonymous_variant 45/491 NM_000260.4 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0283
AC:
4299
AN:
152140
Hom.:
218
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0983
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00838
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0182
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00673
AC:
1339
AN:
198954
Hom.:
42
AF XY:
0.00526
AC XY:
564
AN XY:
107228
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0959
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00397
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00889
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000480
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000413
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00428
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00318
AC:
4539
AN:
1428002
Hom.:
189
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00276
AC XY:
1953
AN XY:
706634
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.105
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00480
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00906
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000263
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000468
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00704
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0283
AC:
4303
AN:
152258
Hom.:
219
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0262
AC XY:
1953
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0981
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00830
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0180
Alfa
AF:
0.0160
Hom.:
72
Bravo
AF:
0.0320
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00635
AC:
23
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 12, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 16, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 14, 2010Lys2021Lys in exon 45 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue is not located near a splice junction and is found commonly in the Black population (5/28 = 18%). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 04, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
6.0
DANN
Benign
0.54

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033209; hg19: chr11-76922208; API