chr12-4370572-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3
The NM_020638.3(FGF23):c.527G>C(p.Arg176Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R176W) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020638.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic ricketsInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- tumoral calcinosis, hyperphosphatemic, familial, 2Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tumoral calcinosis, hyperphosphatemic, familial, 1Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGF23 | ENST00000237837.2 | c.527G>C | p.Arg176Pro | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | 1 | NM_020638.3 | ENSP00000237837.1 | ||
| ENSG00000285901 | ENST00000674624.1 | n.*1204+4290C>G | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 9 | ENSP00000501898.1 | |||||
| ENSG00000285901 | ENST00000648100.1 | n.*1967+4290C>G | intron_variant | Intron 11 of 11 | ENSP00000497536.1 | |||||
| FGF23 | ENST00000648269.1 | n.*70G>C | downstream_gene_variant | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33 
GnomAD4 genome  
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
See cases    Uncertain:1 
ACMG categories: PM2,PM5,PP3,BP1 -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at