chr12-6044368-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 5P and 20B. PM1PM5PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000552.5(VWF):c.2365A>G(p.Thr789Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.356 in 1,613,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 107,997 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T789P) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000552.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.395 AC: 60042AN: 151930Hom.: 13190 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.312 AC: 78459AN: 251226Hom.: 14078 AF XY: 0.311 AC XY: 42243AN XY: 135794
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.352 AC: 514079AN: 1461810Hom.: 94780 Cov.: 59 AF XY: 0.348 AC XY: 253379AN XY: 727206
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.395 AC: 60108AN: 152048Hom.: 13217 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.387 AC XY: 28788AN XY: 74336
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32521332, 30817071, 30046743, 18923835, 23636243, 21163921, 23690449, 21534939) -
Allele frequency is common in at least one population database (frequency: 58.215% in gnomAD_Exomes) based on the frequency threshold of 0.5% for this gene. Variant was observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease. -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
von Willebrand disease type 2 Benign:1
- -
von Willebrand disease type 3 Benign:1
- -
von Willebrand disease type 1 Benign:1
- -
Hereditary von Willebrand disease Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at