Variant chr12-88126418-A-T details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.31178904).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.963T>A	p.Asp321Glu	missense_variant	12/54	ENST00000552810.6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.963T>A	p.Asp321Glu	missense_variant	12/54	1	NM_025114.4	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000855

AC:

13

AN:

152128

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

33

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000543

AC:

9

AN:

165730

Hom.:

0

AF XY:

0.0000548

AC XY:

5

AN XY:

91282

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000110

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000545

AC:

74

AN:

1357148

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

25

AF XY:

0.0000655

AC XY:

44

AN XY:

672068

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000385

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000297

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000192

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000554

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000890

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000855

AC:

13

AN:

152128

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

33

AF XY:

0.0000673

AC XY:

5

AN XY:

74312

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000246

Hom.:

0

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ExAC

AF:

0.0000249

AC:

3

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:4

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System	-	The CEP290 p.Asp321Glu variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in ClinVar or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs774072453) and in control databases in 18 of 197108 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00009132 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the European (non-Finnish) population in 18 of 96916 chromosomes (freq: 0.000186), but was not observed in the African, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Other, or South Asian populations. The p.Asp321 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this has not been confirmed by RNA analysis and is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Mar 29, 2016	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Oct 01, 2023	- -

Joubert syndrome 5

Uncertain:3

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 15, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	research	Molecular Medicine for Neurodegenerative and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris	Jul 12, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard	May 04, 2022	The homozygous p.Asp321Glu variant in CEP290 was identified by our study in 2 siblings with Joubert syndrome 5. The variant has not been previously reported in individuals with Joubert syndrome 5 but has been identified in 0.02% (18/96916) of European non-Finnish chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP ID: rs774072453). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 286797) as having uncertain significance by EGL Genetic Diagnostics, Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics, Fulgent Genetics, and Illumina Clinical Services Laboratory. Computational prediction tools, including splice predictors, and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Asp321Glu variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BP4, PM3_supporting (Richards 2015). -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 15, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

CEP290-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jan 30, 2024

The CEP290 c.963T>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asp321Glu. This variant, along with another uncertain variant in CEP290, has been reported as a variant of uncertain significance, in an individual with congenital ataxia (Table S4, Galatolo et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34445196). This variant is reported in 0.019% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 15, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 15, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Oct 10, 2022

This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 321 of the CEP290 protein (p.Asp321Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs774072453, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Retinitis Pigmentosa (Invitae). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 286797). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt CEP290 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 15, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6;C1857780:Joubert syndrome 5;C1857821:Leber congenital amaurosis 10;C1970161:Meckel syndrome, type 4;C2673874:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Oct 31, 2018

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.61

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.23

T

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.21

CADD

Uncertain

25

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.25

.;T;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.49

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.48

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

D

LIST_S2

Benign

0.85

D;T;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.059

D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.31

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.67

T

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.5

.;M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

D;D;D

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.71

T

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.0

N;N;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.23

Sift

Benign

0.16

T;T;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.17

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

1.0

.;D;.;.

Vest4

0.56

MutPred

0.39

Gain of disorder (P = 0.1349);Gain of disorder (P = 0.1349);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.1349);

MVP

0.64

MPC

0.34

ClinPred

0.61

D

GERP RS

5.3

Varity_R

0.19

gMVP

0.20

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

chr12-88126418-A-T

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over