chr13-102862951-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):āc.1802A>Gā(p.Glu601Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000514 in 1,614,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000123.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | NM_000123.4 | c.1802A>G | p.Glu601Gly | missense_variant | 8/15 | ENST00000652225.2 | |
BIVM-ERCC5 | NM_001204425.2 | c.3164A>G | p.Glu1055Gly | missense_variant | 16/23 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.1802A>G | p.Glu601Gly | missense_variant | 8/15 | NM_000123.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000315 AC: 48AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000716 AC: 18AN: 251340Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000883 AC XY: 12AN XY: 135826
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000233 AC: 34AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000322 AC: 49AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000282 AC XY: 21AN XY: 74498
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at