rs60682853

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):​c.1802A>G​(p.Glu601Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000514 in 1,614,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.971
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008924156).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC5NM_000123.4 linkc.1802A>G p.Glu601Gly missense_variant Exon 8 of 15 ENST00000652225.2 NP_000114.3 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5NM_001204425.2 linkc.3164A>G p.Glu1055Gly missense_variant Exon 16 of 23 NP_001191354.2 R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC5ENST00000652225.2 linkc.1802A>G p.Glu601Gly missense_variant Exon 8 of 15 NM_000123.4 ENSP00000498881.2 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639435.1 linkc.3164A>G p.Glu1055Gly missense_variant Exon 18 of 25 5 ENSP00000491742.1 R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639132.1 linkc.2477A>G p.Glu826Gly missense_variant Exon 17 of 24 5 ENSP00000492684.1 A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000315
AC:
48
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000716
AC:
18
AN:
251340
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000883
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
135826
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000861
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000233
AC:
34
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000193
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000687
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000993
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000322
AC:
49
AN:
152328
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000282
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000580
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000431
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000906
AC:
11

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Other:1
Feb 11, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: ERCC5 c.1802A>G (p.Glu601Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.2e-05 in 251340 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in ERCC5 causing Cerebrooculofacioskeletal Syndrome 3, allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1802A>G in individuals affected with Cerebrooculofacioskeletal Syndrome 3 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 134186). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

not provided Uncertain:1
Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.068
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
3.0
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
.;.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.015
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.54
T;T;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0044
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0089
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.60
.;.;.;N
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.0090
Sift
Benign
0.22
.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.33
.;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.0010
.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.038
MVP
0.19
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.0057
T
GERP RS
-6.4
Varity_R
0.043
gMVP
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.14
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs60682853; hg19: chr13-103515301; API