chr13-50909678-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NR_046552.1(RNASEH2B-AS1):n.230+805G>C variant causes a intron, non coding transcript change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00138 in 168,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000061 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RNASEH2B-AS1
NR_046552.1 intron, non_coding_transcript
NR_046552.1 intron, non_coding_transcript
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.52
Genes affected
RNASEH2B-AS1 (HGNC:39967): (RNASEH2B antisense RNA 1)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNASEH2B-AS1 | NR_046552.1 | n.230+805G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNASEH2B-AS1 | ENST00000596992.5 | n.112+805G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00150 AC: 229AN: 152228Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
229
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000608 AC: 1AN: 16450Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 8898
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
16450
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
8898
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00152 AC: 232AN: 152346Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 112AN XY: 74494
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
232
AN:
152346
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
112
AN XY:
74494
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at