chr13-75362274-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_014832.5(TBC1D4):c.832C>T(p.Leu278Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000248 in 1,613,704 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014832.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBC1D4 | NM_014832.5 | c.832C>T | p.Leu278Phe | missense_variant | 2/21 | ENST00000377636.8 | NP_055647.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBC1D4 | ENST00000377636.8 | c.832C>T | p.Leu278Phe | missense_variant | 2/21 | 2 | NM_014832.5 | ENSP00000366863 | A1 | |
TBC1D4 | ENST00000431480.6 | c.832C>T | p.Leu278Phe | missense_variant | 2/20 | 1 | ENSP00000395986 | P3 | ||
TBC1D4 | ENST00000377625.6 | c.832C>T | p.Leu278Phe | missense_variant | 2/19 | 1 | ENSP00000366852 | A1 | ||
TBC1D4 | ENST00000648194.1 | c.289C>T | p.Leu97Phe | missense_variant | 3/20 | ENSP00000496983 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461508Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727082
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 29, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at