chr14-104689664-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_022489.4(INF2):c.-85G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.123 in 982,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7,879 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.093 ( 885 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.13 ( 6994 hom. )
Consequence
INF2
NM_022489.4 5_prime_UTR
NM_022489.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.148
Genes affected
INF2 (HGNC:23791): (inverted formin 2) This gene represents a member of the formin family of proteins. It is considered a diaphanous formin due to the presence of a diaphanous inhibitory domain located at the N-terminus of the encoded protein. Studies of a similar mouse protein indicate that the protein encoded by this locus may function in polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments. Mutations at this locus have been associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 14-104689664-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-104689664-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 312673.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-104689664-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.132 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INF2 | NM_022489.4 | c.-85G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/23 | ENST00000392634.9 | ||
INF2 | NM_001031714.4 | c.-85G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/22 | |||
INF2 | NM_032714.3 | c.-85G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INF2 | ENST00000392634.9 | c.-85G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/23 | 5 | NM_022489.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0930 AC: 13994AN: 150434Hom.: 884 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
13994
AN:
150434
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.129 AC: 107130AN: 831682Hom.: 6994 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.129 AC XY: 49532AN XY: 384086
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
107130
AN:
831682
Hom.:
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
AC XY:
49532
AN XY:
384086
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0930 AC: 13995AN: 150538Hom.: 885 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0927 AC XY: 6820AN XY: 73566
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
13995
AN:
150538
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
6820
AN XY:
73566
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
199
AN:
3424
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at