chr14-23386375-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002471.4(MYH6):​c.4899C>T​(p.His1633His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000948 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0048 ( 8 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

MYH6
NM_002471.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -6.12

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH6 (HGNC:7576): (myosin heavy chain 6) Cardiac muscle myosin is a hexamer consisting of two heavy chain subunits, two light chain subunits, and two regulatory subunits. This gene encodes the alpha heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. The gene is located approximately 4kb downstream of the gene encoding the beta heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. Mutations in this gene cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial septal defect 3. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2017]
MYH6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • Keppen-Lubinsky syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Illumina
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • atrial septal defect 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 14-23386375-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-23386375-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 44524.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-6.12 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00477 (727/152332) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0167 (694/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0157. There are 8 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 346 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 727 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH6NM_002471.4 linkc.4899C>T p.His1633His synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 39 ENST00000405093.9 NP_002462.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH6ENST00000405093.9 linkc.4899C>T p.His1633His synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 39 5 NM_002471.4 ENSP00000386041.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00477
AC:
726
AN:
152214
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0167
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00130
AC:
327
AN:
251436
AF XY:
0.000979
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000652
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000550
AC:
804
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
71
AF XY:
0.000499
AC XY:
363
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0177
AC:
594
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
55
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
49
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
13
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000288
AC:
32
AN:
1111966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000994
AC:
60
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
53
106
158
211
264
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00477
AC:
727
AN:
152332
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00464
AC XY:
346
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0167
AC:
694
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
20
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000579
AC:
3
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
38
76
115
153
191
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00145
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00535
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 14, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Feb 23, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

His1633His in exon 33 of MYH6: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1.2% (44/3738) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61742474).

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Dec 01, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Jul 30, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 13, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
0.17
DANN
Benign
0.91
PhyloP100
-6.1
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61742474; hg19: chr14-23855584; API