chr14-24255457-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000359.3(TGM1):c.1552G>A(p.Val518Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0159 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 230 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 18 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.016 ( 212 hom. )
Consequence
TGM1
NM_000359.3 missense
NM_000359.3 missense
Scores
6
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.624
Genes affected
TGM1 (HGNC:11777): (transglutaminase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a membrane protein that catalyzes the addition of an alkyl group from an akylamine to a glutamine residue of a protein, forming an alkylglutamine in the protein. This protein alkylation leads to crosslinking of proteins and catenation of polyamines to proteins. This gene contains either one or two copies of a 22 nt repeat unit in its 3' UTR. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive lamellar ichthyosis (LI) and nonbullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (NCIE). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0077917576).
BP6
Variant 14-24255457-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-24255457-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 12496.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}. Variant chr14-24255457-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr14-24255457-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr14-24255457-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0109 (1661/152256) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0185 (1261/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0177. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 771 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 18 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGM1 | NM_000359.3 | c.1552G>A | p.Val518Met | missense_variant | 11/15 | ENST00000206765.11 | NP_000350.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGM1 | ENST00000206765.11 | c.1552G>A | p.Val518Met | missense_variant | 11/15 | 1 | NM_000359.3 | ENSP00000206765.6 | ||
TGM1 | ENST00000544573.5 | c.226G>A | p.Val76Met | missense_variant | 5/9 | 2 | ENSP00000439446.1 | |||
TGM1 | ENST00000559136.1 | c.625G>A | p.Val209Met | missense_variant | 7/7 | 5 | ENSP00000453337.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0109 AC: 1661AN: 152138Hom.: 18 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1661
AN:
152138
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0107 AC: 2691AN: 251390Hom.: 28 AF XY: 0.0108 AC XY: 1464AN XY: 135898
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2691
AN:
251390
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1464
AN XY:
135898
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0164 AC: 23995AN: 1461860Hom.: 212 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0162 AC XY: 11748AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
23995
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
11748
AN XY:
727230
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0109 AC: 1661AN: 152256Hom.: 18 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0104 AC XY: 771AN XY: 74446
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1661
AN:
152256
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
771
AN XY:
74446
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
62
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
84
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
17
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
137
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1264
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 1 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | - | The p.Val518Met variant in TGM1 has been identified in at least 2 individuals with lamellar ichthyosis (PMID: 9545389), and has been identified in >1% of Euroopean (Finnish) chromosomes and 6 homozygotes by ExAC (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for lamellar ichthyosis. - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Apr 01, 2001 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 23, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | TGM1: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;D;.
Polyphen
D;.;.
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at