chr14-24261740-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 1P and 7B. PP3BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_000359.3(TGM1):c.463C>T(p.Arg155Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000248 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

TGM1
NM_000359.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.69

Variant links:

Genes affected

TGM1 (HGNC:11777): (transglutaminase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a membrane protein that catalyzes the addition of an alkyl group from an akylamine to a glutamine residue of a protein, forming an alkylglutamine in the protein. This protein alkylation leads to crosslinking of proteins and catenation of polyamines to proteins. This gene contains either one or two copies of a 22 nt repeat unit in its 3' UTR. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive lamellar ichthyosis (LI) and nonbullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (NCIE). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TGM1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PP3

Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI was below the threshold]

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1773006).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000204 (31/152238) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00599 (31/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00434. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 13 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TGM1	NM_000359.3 link	c.463C>T	p.Arg155Trp	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 15	ENST00000206765.11	NP_000350.1	P22735-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TGM1	ENST00000206765.11 link	c.463C>T	p.Arg155Trp	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 15	1	NM_000359.3	ENSP00000206765.6		P22735-1
TGM1	ENST00000544573.5 link	c.-29+387C>T		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 8	2		ENSP00000439446.1		P22735-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000204

AC:

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00598

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000509

AC:

128

AN:

251424

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000442

AC XY:

AN XY:

135896

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00642

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000252

AC:

369

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000270

AC XY:

196

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00851

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000104

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000204

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000175

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00599

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000492

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000268

ExAC

AF:

0.000560

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 1

Uncertain:4

Oct 01, 2021

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

NM_000359.2(TGM1):c.463C>T(R155W) is a missense variant classified as a variant of uncertain significance in the context of TGM1-related autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis. R155W has been observed in cases with relevant disease (PMID: 19262603, 25154629, 20021785). Functional assessments of this variant are not available in the literature. R155W has been observed in population frequency databases (gnomAD: EAS 0.65%). In summary, there is insufficient evidence to classify NM_000359.2(TGM1):c.463C>T(R155W) as pathogenic or benign. Please note: this variant was assessed in the context of healthy population screening. -

Mar 18, 2016

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Nov 13, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

TGM1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 09, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 18, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.59

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.031

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.27

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.95

Eigen

Uncertain

0.48

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.34

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.35

MetaRNN

Benign

0.18

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.68

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.1

PrimateAI

Benign

0.45

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.8

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.79

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0010

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.85

MVP

0.98

MPC

0.94

ClinPred

0.27

GERP RS

4.1

Varity_R

0.86

gMVP

0.87

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over