rs187901859

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 1P and 7B. PP3BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_000359.3(TGM1):​c.463C>T​(p.Arg155Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000248 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

TGM1
NM_000359.3 missense

Scores

10
5
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.69
Variant links:
Genes affected
TGM1 (HGNC:11777): (transglutaminase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a membrane protein that catalyzes the addition of an alkyl group from an akylamine to a glutamine residue of a protein, forming an alkylglutamine in the protein. This protein alkylation leads to crosslinking of proteins and catenation of polyamines to proteins. This gene contains either one or two copies of a 22 nt repeat unit in its 3' UTR. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive lamellar ichthyosis (LI) and nonbullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (NCIE). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1773006).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000204 (31/152238) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00599 (31/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00434. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 13 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TGM1NM_000359.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.463C>T p.Arg155Trp missense_variant 3/15 ENST00000206765.11 NP_000350.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TGM1ENST00000206765.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.463C>T p.Arg155Trp missense_variant 3/151 NM_000359.3 ENSP00000206765 P1P22735-1
TGM1ENST00000544573.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.-29+387C>T intron_variant 2 ENSP00000439446 P22735-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000204
AC:
31
AN:
152120
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00598
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000509
AC:
128
AN:
251424
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000442
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
135896
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00642
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000252
AC:
369
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000270
AC XY:
196
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00851
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000104
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000204
AC:
31
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00599
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000492
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000268
ExAC
AF:
0.000560
AC:
68
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 1 Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterreference populationSoonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical CenterMar 18, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Nov 13, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Oct 01, 2021NM_000359.2(TGM1):c.463C>T(R155W) is a missense variant classified as a variant of uncertain significance in the context of TGM1-related autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis. R155W has been observed in cases with relevant disease (PMID: 19262603, 25154629, 20021785). Functional assessments of this variant are not available in the literature. R155W has been observed in population frequency databases (gnomAD: EAS 0.65%). In summary, there is insufficient evidence to classify NM_000359.2(TGM1):c.463C>T(R155W) as pathogenic or benign. Please note: this variant was assessed in the context of healthy population screening. -
TGM1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 09, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.59
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.031
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.27
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.95
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.48
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.35
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.18
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.68
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.1
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.8
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.79
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0010
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.85
MVP
0.98
MPC
0.94
ClinPred
0.27
T
GERP RS
4.1
Varity_R
0.86
gMVP
0.87

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs187901859; hg19: chr14-24730946; API