chr14-53950804-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001202.6(BMP4):āc.455T>Cā(p.Val152Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.519 in 1,612,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 227,142 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.44 ( 16493 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.53 ( 210649 hom. )
Consequence
BMP4
NM_001202.6 missense
NM_001202.6 missense
Scores
2
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.23
Genes affected
BMP4 (HGNC:1071): (bone morphogenetic protein 4) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates heart development and adipogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with orofacial cleft and microphthalmia in human patients. The encoded protein may also be involved in the pathology of multiple cardiovascular diseases and human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.141868E-4).
BP6
?
Variant 14-53950804-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-53950804-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 197190.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-53950804-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.562 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMP4 | NM_001202.6 | c.455T>C | p.Val152Ala | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000245451.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMP4 | ENST00000245451.9 | c.455T>C | p.Val152Ala | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_001202.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.439 AC: 66805AN: 152032Hom.: 16484 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
66805
AN:
152032
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.453 AC: 112585AN: 248720Hom.: 28013 AF XY: 0.459 AC XY: 61893AN XY: 134882
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
112585
AN:
248720
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
61893
AN XY:
134882
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.527 AC: 769729AN: 1460430Hom.: 210649 Cov.: 63 AF XY: 0.523 AC XY: 380276AN XY: 726548
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
769729
AN:
1460430
Hom.:
Cov.:
63
AF XY:
AC XY:
380276
AN XY:
726548
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.439 AC: 66834AN: 152150Hom.: 16493 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.437 AC XY: 32480AN XY: 74400
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
66834
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
32480
AN XY:
74400
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2141
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2227
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1138
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4715
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
55051
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1004
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 25, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cleft Lip +/- Cleft Palate, Autosomal Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Orofacial cleft 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 02, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies;C2677434:Orofacial cleft 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L;L;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
P;P;P;P
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;.
Polyphen
B;B;B;B;.
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at