chr15-48744295-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):​c.3780G>C​(p.Gly1260Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000156 in 1,613,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G1260G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0240

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
CEP152 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • microcephaly with or without short stature
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Seckel syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Seckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 15-48744295-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48744295-C-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 316412.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.024 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CEP152NM_001194998.2 linkc.3780G>C p.Gly1260Gly synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 27 ENST00000380950.7 NP_001181927.1 O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP152ENST00000380950.7 linkc.3780G>C p.Gly1260Gly synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 27 1 NM_001194998.2 ENSP00000370337.2 O94986-4
CEP152ENST00000399334.7 linkc.3612G>C p.Gly1204Gly synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 26 1 ENSP00000382271.3 O94986-3
CEP152ENST00000325747.9 linkc.3501G>C p.Gly1167Gly synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 25 1 ENSP00000321000.5 O94986-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000178
AC:
27
AN:
152102
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000285
AC:
71
AN:
249522
AF XY:
0.000259
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00636
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000530
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000165
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000154
AC:
225
AN:
1461750
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000143
AC XY:
104
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00624
AC:
163
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000333
AC:
37
AN:
1111948
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
25
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.465
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16
32
48
64
80
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000178
AC:
27
AN:
152102
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000188
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
74296
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41428
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00605
AC:
21
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10584
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2086
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.521
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
5
7
9
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000418
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000189
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Seckel syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
Jun 20, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
2.3
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
-0.024
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199777941; hg19: chr15-49036492; API