chr16-2084447-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM5BP4BP6BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4225C>T(p.Arg1409Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000167 in 1,609,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1409G) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.25

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr16-2084447-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.4073082).

BP6

Variant 16-2084447-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2084447-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41740.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=2}. Variant chr16-2084447-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-2084447-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.4225C>T	p.Arg1409Trp	missense_variant	Exon 34 of 42	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2	P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.4225C>T	p.Arg1409Trp	missense_variant	Exon 34 of 42	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3		P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000542

AC:

AN:

239990

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000535

AC XY:

AN XY:

130926

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000102

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000340

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000178

AC:

259

AN:

1456986

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000168

AC XY:

122

AN XY:

724650

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000300

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000113

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000384

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000234

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000214

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000199

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74368

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000116

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000945

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000117

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000912

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11Other:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Apr 25, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 19, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. This variant has been seen where an alternate explanation for disease was also identified. Assessment of experimental evidence regarding the effect of this variant on protein function is inconclusive (PMID: 21309039). -

Feb 25, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: TSC2 c.4225C>T (p.Arg1409Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.4e-05 in 239990 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0001 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is slightly higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TSC2 causing Tuberous Sclerosis Complex phenotype (6.9e-05), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.4225C>T has been reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (Zarei_2002). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant (Hoogeveen-Westerveld_2011). Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (benign/likely benign n=3; VUS n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

not provided

Benign:3

Jan 24, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Feb 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TSC2: BS2 -

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:2Other:1

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 05-23-2019 by Lab Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Mar 04, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2

Uncertain:1

Mar 30, 2021

Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TSC2 NM_000548 exon 34 p.Arg1409Trp (c.4225C>T): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 11/121418 European alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rs45517333). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as likely benign or benign (Variation ID: 41740). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

TSC2-related disorder

Benign:1

Mar 15, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Other:1

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.073

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.051

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.040

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.70

D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.32

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.21

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.82

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.93

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.34

MetaRNN

Benign

0.41

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.21

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.69

N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.46

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.9

D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.52

Sift

Benign

0.032

D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.014

D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D

Polyphen

0.99

D;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.42

MVP

0.92

ClinPred

0.12

GERP RS

2.9

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.095

gMVP

0.42

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over