chr17-18163805-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):āc.9754A>Gā(p.Asn3252Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00184 in 1,614,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO15A | NM_016239.4 | c.9754A>G | p.Asn3252Asp | missense_variant | 60/66 | ENST00000647165.2 | NP_057323.3 | |
MYO15A | XM_017024715.3 | c.9757A>G | p.Asn3253Asp | missense_variant | 58/64 | XP_016880204.1 | ||
MYO15A | XM_017024714.3 | c.9694A>G | p.Asn3232Asp | missense_variant | 57/63 | XP_016880203.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO15A | ENST00000647165.2 | c.9754A>G | p.Asn3252Asp | missense_variant | 60/66 | NM_016239.4 | ENSP00000495481.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00191 AC: 290AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00242 AC: 603AN: 249064Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00274 AC XY: 371AN XY: 135158
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00183 AC: 2676AN: 1461754Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00193 AC XY: 1407AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00191 AC: 291AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00197 AC XY: 147AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 24, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 30, 2012 | Asn3252Asp in Exon 60 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.4% (26/6804) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs147458358). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 22, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | MYO15A: BP4, BS2 - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
MYO15A-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 17, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 07, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at